Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- eis:types:privacy [2025/02/08 10:12] – [Examples:] tom
+++ eis:types:privacy [2025/02/08 16:42] (current) – [Examples] tom
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Privacy ======
-__**Definition:**__
+Definition:\\
+<wrap em>Users’ identities and data are not kept secure, or their data is used for purposes other than what they agree to.</wrap> [2]
-Users’ identities and data are not kept secure, or their data is used for purposes other than what they agree to.
 ===== Subtypes =====
-  * Targeted advertising [1]
+<tabbox Targeted advertising>
-  * Sharing with Third-parties [1]
+"Participants are concerned about targeted advertising and perceive it as invasive and a breach of their privacy. They often describe how ads precisely relate to some content they have viewed or information they shared in private"[1]
-  * Data Tracking and Monitoring [1]
-  * Unauthorized Access [1]
+<tabbox Sharing with Third-parties>
-  * Excessive Data Collection [1]
+"Concern towards companies sharing personal data with third-parties such as marketing, or government agencies."[1]
-===== Examples: =====
+<tabbox Data Tracking and Monitoring>
+"The feeling of being tracked or followed is expressed vividly. This is both voiced within and outside the context of targeted advertisements."[1]
+<tabbox Unauthorized Access>
+"[People] share their concern about the protection of their personal data from unauthorized access."[1]
+<tabbox Excessive Data Collection>
+"People note that data is collected in excess. They believe these masses of data to be irrelevant to the functionality of the software application."[1]
+</tabbox>
+----
+===== Examples =====
+<WRAP group>
+<WRAP half column>
+==== Has ethical issue in software ====
 ^ Statement ^ Stance ^ Reasoning ^
-| I find targeted ads concerning because it’s almost infringing on your privacy [1] | **against** | Perceives <wrap hi>targeted ads</wrap> as an infringement on personal privacy, opposes it. |
+| I find targeted ads concerning because it’s almost infringing on your privacy [1] | **against** | Perceives <wrap hi>**targeted advertizing**</wrap> as an infringement on personal privacy, opposes it. |
-| All your personal information is out there because it's helpful, but at the same time,\\ you are not at all anonymous anymore. [1] | **neutral** | Identifies objectively both pros and cons of , does not indicate personal position. |
+| All your personal information is out there because it's helpful, but at the same time, you are not at all anonymous anymore. [1] | **neutral** | Identifies objectively both pros and cons of <wrap hi>**Data Tracking and Monitoring**</wrap>, does not indicate personal position. |
 |  |  |  |
+</WRAP>
+<WRAP half column>
+==== Not qualifying as EIS ====
+^ Statement ^ Reasoning ^
+| I'm not tech savy so I tried messing with security settings and turned on two factor among other things and I was still locked out. Luckily the person who has my old phone was understanding and after changing the password to a dummy password to give to them they got me back in but they do want to wipe it soon. Two factor also started sending codes back to the old phone or it always did? I'm not sure. I feel like I've been messing with the settings and making it worse so I stopped and came here to ask. | As a tech-savvy person, it is clear that this activity puts that person's privacy at risk. The person appears to know that they do not use the software optimally. Yet, they do not raise an ethical issue, nor do we have evidence from previous research indicating that this is perceived as an ethical issue. |
+| I do actually use Microsoft Edge in Linux and I'm pretty satisfied with it for most. I love the memory management, it's very efficient. One major thing that's not here is Copilot, not much of an issue though. It's somehow just seemingly misleading for the sidebar to be indicated with the Copilot logo. New look and feel doesn't work too, or at least like how it should look in Windows, though again, it's fine. | People are concerned about the ethical issue of having AI in every product, but this text is not talking about that topic, they are doing a very general product review. It would have been in favor of that ethical issue if they had made the post on that topic, e.g., indicating that they want their personal data to be collected. |
+</WRAP>
+</WRAP>
+----
 ===== References =====