Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- eis:types:discrimination [2025/02/04 16:04] – [Examples:] tom
+++ eis:types:discrimination [2025/02/04 18:27] (current) – tom
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 the people with a different skin color or a different
 background like. I don’t think that’s relevant at all,
-and it shouldn’t be in such an application process.''
+and it shouldn’t be in such an application process.''[1]
 __Neutral:__
@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 and can be done by Harvard students that are white.
 You know what I mean? This is just what always has
-happened''
+happened.''[1]
 <wrap lo>It is not clear if this person condemns such behavior of software. They state that things have always been that way. To them it is obvious that algorithms will mimic human biases. But they are not clear about if they want the software to be changed to address this issue. They can oppose discrimination and still be in favor of not addressing this issue in software.</wrap>
 __In favor:__
+===== References =====
+<WRAP group>
+<WRAP half column>
+[1] Yagil Elias, Tom P. Humbert, Lauren Olson, Emitzá Guzmán. What is unethical about software? User perceptions in the Netherlands. Proceedings of ICSE-SEIS (2025). IEEE.\\
+[2] Tjikhoeri, N., Olson, L. & Guzmán, E. The best ends by the best means: ethical concerns in app reviews. Empir Software Eng 29, 138 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-024-10463-7\\
+</WRAP>
+<WRAP half column>
+[3] L. Olson, E. Guzmán and F. Kunneman, "Along the Margins: Marginalized Communities’ Ethical Concerns about Social Platforms," 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS), Melbourne, Australia, 2023, pp. 71-82, doi: 10.1109/ICSE-SEIS58686.2023.00013.
+</WRAP>
+</WRAP>