Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| eis:resources:eis_classification [2025/02/05 09:55] – tom | eis:resources:eis_classification [2025/02/05 12:09] (current) – tom | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| <WRAP half column> | <WRAP half column> | ||
| ===== Is it related to software? ===== | ===== Is it related to software? ===== | ||
| - | In this study we only focus on ethical issues that relate to the software applications that the Reddit posts were written about. The data you are dealing with should show which app the text is supposed to relate to. If the post does not relate to this application, | + | In this study we only focus on ethical issues that relate to the software applications that the Reddit posts were written about. The data you are dealing with should show which app the text is supposed to relate to. If the post does not relate to this application, |
| ===== Is it an ethical issue? ===== | ===== Is it an ethical issue? ===== | ||
| - | See if it fits [[glossary: | + | See if it fits [[glossary: |
| + | On Reddit, we most often observe people speaking out against an ethical issue. Redditors express their [[glossary: | ||
| + | Rarely, Redditors create posts that directly dismisses another group' | ||
| + | If a text speaks about a specific topic that we know is seen as an ethical issue (see our EIS types and subtypes), but the author is not concerned about it, it should still be given a TRUE label for containing an EIS. An example would be [[https:// | ||
| ==== EIS Type ==== | ==== EIS Type ==== | ||
eis/resources/eis_classification.1738745758.txt.gz · Last modified: by tom